Research Review Brief – Education vs. Symptom Based Modification for cLBP
Research Review Brief
An educational approach based on a non-injury model compared with individual symptom-based physical training in chronic LBP. A pragmatic, randomised trial with a one-year follow-up – Sorensen, et al.
207 patients 18-60 years (52% female)with LBP for at least 4 out of the last 12 months with the last 14 days =/>4/10 on a VAS. If they had leg pain, the back pain had to be a worse complaint. All subjects made it through the study with no drop out in either groups (impressive!)
Group 1 (EDUC): 105 Subjects received an educational approach designed to improve confidence in the robustness of the spine and two movements: Seated flexion and rotation
Group 2: 102 Subjects received Symptom Classification Based Treatment – MDT(by certified MDT) Directional preference, Stabilization, or intensive dynamic exercise. IN ADDITION: group 2’s physical therapists could at their own discretion referred for pharmacology, manual therapy, or physician for injection to complement their symptom based plan
Pain, Activity Limitation, FABQ, Back Beliefs, physical activity, work ability, quality of life
Primary Outcomes: Non-significant trend towards activity limitation being reduced mostly in the educational group although this could not be determined as clinically relevant.
Secondary outcomes: Improvement in fear-avoidance beliefs was better in the educational group. All other variables were about equally influenced by the two treatments.
The median number of treatment sessions was 3 for the educational group and 6 for the physical training group.
“We have demonstrated that, among patients with cLBP, the educational/cognitive intervention with few consultations was at least as effective as an individualized, multidisciplinary physical-training approach. ‘At least’ refers to the observed overall trend of more improvement in activity-limitation with EDUC. ”
“There was a statistically significant difference at 2 months in favor of EDUC in the proportion of people improving by a Minimal Important Change (MIC) in activity-limitation (5 or more points on the LBP Rating Scale).
“Post-hoc regression analysis showed a relationship between improved activity limitation and improvement in FABQ, and FABQ was more improved in the EDUC group at all three follow-ups, on balance these data appear to favour the EDUC approach.”
Full article Available Here.
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!